SHIVAM RAUT ALIA SHIVAM KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7113/2026 · 2026-08-24
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:25544 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 7113 of 2026
Shivam Raut @ Shivam Kumar, aged about 23 years, son of Jiwlal Raut, resident of Village- Manjhiladih, P.O. and P.S. Birni, District - Giridih.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Prabhash Ch. Sinha, Advocate
---
08/24.08.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.05.2026 in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 115 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under sections 115 (2)/118(2)/ 109(1)/ 74 read with 3(5) of B.N.S. Act, pending in the court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted on 05.08.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 109 and other analogous sections of BNS.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State and the informant, while opposing the prayer for bail, have submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner, who inflicted Tangi blow on the head of the victim, due to which the victim suffered grievous injuries. Therefore, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.
5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner also suffered injuries which is apparent from the impugned
order and the petitioner has filed a complaint case.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is direct allegation made against the
2026:JHHC:25544 2
petitioner, due to which the victim has suffered grievous injuries on his head, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. The instant bail application is hereby rejected.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 24.08.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-29.08.2026