CRM-M-33544- 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Arashdeep Singh State of Punjab CORAM : HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. G.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab. DEEPAK GUPTA 1. This is the regular bail in case FIR No. (corresponding to Sections 307, 120 registered at Police Station Gurdaspur. 2. The FIR was lodged per which on 25.03.2026 a motor-cycle followed him and one of them, namely, Rupa the intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he entered the house of Rajwant Singh alias Mela. Co motorcycle and again fired. The bullet hit his back. Both motor-cycle. It is revealed further that during investigation it emerge Amritjit Singh, who was riding the motor complainant. -2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM Date of Decision : Arashdeep Singh VERSUS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. G.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab. -.- DEEPAK GUPTA J. (Oral) This is the first petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.47 dated 25.03.2026 (corresponding to Sections 307, 120-B IPC) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Dera Baba Nanak, The FIR was lodged on the complaint of Sukhraj Singh alias Kaka, as per which on 25.03.2026 as he was moving on his motor cycle followed him and one of them, namely, Rupa intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he entered the house of Rajwant Singh alias Mela. Co motorcycle and again fired. The bullet hit his back. Both It is revealed further that during investigation it emerge Amritjit Singh, who was riding the motor-cycle from which Rupa had fired upon the -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33544-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.06.2026 ....Petitioner ....Respondent DEEPAK GUPTA Mr. G.S.Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab. petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of 25.03.2026, under Section 109, 61(2) of BNS B IPC) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act Dera Baba Nanak, Police District Batala, District the complaint of Sukhraj Singh alias Kaka, as he was moving on his motor-cycle, two young persons cycle followed him and one of them, namely, Rupa had fired a gun shot with intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he entered the house of Rajwant Singh alias Mela. Co-accused Rupa alighted from the motorcycle and again fired. The bullet hit his back. Both the accused fled away on the It is revealed further that during investigation it emerged that it was cycle from which Rupa had fired upon the petition filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of 109, 61(2) of BNS B IPC) and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act, Police District Batala, District the complaint of Sukhraj Singh alias Kaka, as , two young persons on with intention to kill him. The bullet hit his left bicep. In order to save his life, he accused Rupa alighted from the the accused fled away on the was cycle from which Rupa had fired upon the TRIPTI SAINI 2026.06.17 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-33544- 3. It is submitted by the l has been falsely implicated complainant only to the effect that conspiracy was hatched at the tube petitioner and he was also involved therein petitioner is in custody conclude. 4. Notice of motion. 5. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent – State. 6. Learned Sta named in the FIR crime was driven by Amritjit Singh petitioner has cropped up in the supplementary statement recovery had been effected from the present petitioner. 7. Heard. 8. As per custody certificate filed by the learned State co petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in any other case. 9. Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. 10. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. June 16, 2026 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable -2026 (O&M) It is submitted by the learned counsel has been falsely implicated on the basis of the only to the effect that conspiracy was hatched at the tube petitioner and he was also involved therein. Learned couns petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2026; that the trial is likely to take long time to Notice of motion. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Learned State counsel concedes to named in the FIR to have fired the gun-shot and that the motor driven by Amritjit Singh, as per the investigation and that name of the petitioner has cropped up in the supplementary statement recovery had been effected from the present petitioner. Heard. As per custody certificate filed by the learned State co petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- earned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner on the basis of the supplementary statement of the only to the effect that conspiracy was hatched at the tube-well of the Learned counsel further contends that ; that the trial is likely to take long time to Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the the position that it is Rupa, who is shot and that the motor-cycle used in the said , as per the investigation and that name of the petitioner has cropped up in the supplementary statement of the complainant. recovery had been effected from the present petitioner. As per custody certificate filed by the learned State counsel, the petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting anything upon the merits of the case, the petitioner is admitted to regular bail and he is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court concerned, on usual terms and conditions. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE speaking : Speaking : Yes/No petitioner statement of the well of the el further contends that ; that the trial is likely to take long time to Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the it is Rupa, who is cycle used in the said , as per the investigation and that name of the of the complainant. No unsel, the petitioner is in custody for the last 02 months and 08 days and he is not involved in Having regard to the aforesaid factual position, but without commenting to regular bail and he is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the TRIPTI SAINI 2026.06.17 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document