Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24376 (PAT)

Md. Jalaluddin v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/8750/2026 · 2026-07-14

Harish Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8750 of 2026 ====================================================== Md. Jalaluddin Son of Abu Bakar, Resident of Mohalla- Khudanagar, Police Station- Motihari Town, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran. 3. The District Education Officer, East Champaran. 4. The Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna. 5. The Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna. 6. The Secretary, Managing Committee, Madrasa Anjuman Islamia (Madrasa no.- 66), Motihari, District East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG 5 Mr. V. Prasad, AC to AAG 5 For the Madarsa Board : Mr. Shahzad Hassan, Adv. Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 14-07-2026 Learned Advocates for the respective parties are present. 2. The petitioner, while invoking the jurisdiction of this Court, has sought the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider his representation dated 24.04.2026 and upon due consideration to hand over the charge of Principal of Madrasa Anjuman Islamia (Madarsa No. 66), Motihari, East Champaran to the Patna High Court CWJC No.8750 of 2026 dt.14-07-2026 2/2 petitioner, being the senior-most teacher in the said institution. 3. Learned Advocates for the petitioner and the Madrasa Board apprised this Court that during the pendency of the writ petition the representation of the petitioner was duly considered by the Madrasa Board and reasoned and speaking order has been passed, which is appealabe in nature. 4. At this stage, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to assail the order as contained in Memo No. 1326 dated 10.06.2026 before the appellate authority. 5. In view thereof, the present writ petition stands closed with liberty aforesaid. Anjani/- (Harish Kumar, J) AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14 .07.2026 Transmission Date