Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24371 (AP)

M. Venkateswara Rao v. The District Water Management Agency

WP/35544/2014 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.35544_2014 APHC010488432014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35544/2014 Between: 1. M. VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. RAMULU, AGE : 29 YEARS, 0CC: FIELD ASSISTANT, NREGS, R/O. CH POTHEPALLI VILLAGE, DWARAKA THIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/, PROGRAMME OFFICER, DWARAKA THIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the proceedings in Rc. No. APO/38/2013, dt. 01.08.2013, issued by the 2nd respondent and the consequential show cause notice issued in Rc. No. HR/2105/2014, dt. 23.08.2014 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the disciplinary policy and also violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Filed Assistant under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme to Ch.Pothepalli Village, Dwaraka Thirumala Mandal, 2 HN, J W.P.No.35544_2014 West Godavari District with consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 44458 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Rc. No. APO/38/2013, dt. 01.08.2013, issued by the 2nd respondent and the consequential show cause notice issued in Rc. No. HR/2105/2014, dt. 23.08.2014 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 HN, J W.P.No.35544_2014 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that the petitioner has challenged the order of suspension dated 01.08.2013. 2. It is further submitted that the respondents have passed final orders dated 06.01.2015. In view of the same, no further orders need to be passed in the present writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.35544_2014 159 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 35544 of 2014 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA