Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24370 (KAR)

MR. VENKATADASAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5787/2020 · 2026-06-23

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31028 WP No. 5787 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 5787 OF 2020 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. MR. VENKATADASAIAH SINE DEAD (DIED ON 01.03.2025) REPTD. BY HIS LRS 1(A). SMT. K.V. LATHA W/O CHANNAKESHAVA D/O LATE VENKATADASAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 1(B). SMT. K.V. SUDHA W/O DIVAKAR D/O LATE VENKATADASAIAH AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.94/25A, SHANKARANAGAR MAIN ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560 096. 2. MR. K.V. SRINIVASA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O SRI.VENKATADASAIAH 3. MR. LOKESH K V S/O SRI VENKATADASAIAH Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31028 WP No. 5787 of 2020 AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. MR. DUGGALAIAH @ DUGGAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O LATE MR.GOVINDAIAH 5. MR. GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE MR.VENKATESH, 6. MR.NAGARAJU K.G. AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH 7. MR. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O MR.NARASAIAH, PETITIONERS 6 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT KITTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK - 562 130. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. D. GANGADHARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTD BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDHAYA BHAVANA, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31028 WP No. 5787 of 2020 GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE THASILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 009. 5. THE SPECIAL THASILDAR BANGALOREO NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 009. 6. SMT. YASHODA AGED 57 YEARS, W/O LATE MR.YELLAPPA, 7. MR.DURGESH KUMAR AGED 33 YEARS, S/O LATE MR.YELLAPPA, 8. MR.MANJUNATH AGED 30 YEARS, S/O LATE MR. YELLAPPA, 9. MR.DUGGALAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE MR.GANGAIAH, 10. SMT.RENUKAMMA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O MR.DUGGALAIAH 11. MR. SIDDAPPA @ SIDDARAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31028 WP No. 5787 of 2020 S/O MR.GANGAIAH 12. SMT. MUNIYAMMA AGED 39 YEARS, W/O MR.SIDDAPPA @ SIDDARAJU, RESPONDENTS 6 TO 12 ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.218, KITTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. 13. MR. B. MADAIAH AGED 51 YEARS, S/O LATE MR. BHADREGOWDA, 14. MR. B. CHANDRSHEKAR AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE BHADREGOWDA, RESPONDENTS 13 AND 14 ARE RESIDING AT BEKKELE VILLAGE, KOPPA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. PRESENT ADDRESS M/S. B.M.C. LAND DEVELOPERS, CHAMUNDI NAGARA RATHUTHANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, KITTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 562 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. KRISHNA NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R14) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31028 WP No. 5787 of 2020 IMPUGNED ORDER ANNX-W UNDATED ORDER PASSED BY THE SPECIAL THASILDAR, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE ON THE APPLICATION DATED 17.09.2019 IN RESPECT OF LAND SY.NO.114, MEASURING 02 ACRES 14 GUNTAS, OUT OF TOTAL EXTENT OF 05 ACRES 34 GUNTAS (INCLUDING 10 GUNTAS OF KHARAB) SITUATED AT KITTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, AND TO QUASH PROCEEDINGS IN ANNX-Y-3 DATED 20.12.2019 AND 18.02.2020 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER INAAMTHI LAND SY.NO.114, THOTI SERVICE LAND AND THE IMPLEADING APPLICATION FILED BY THE R-13 AND 14 AS ILLEGAL AND VOID TRANSACTIONS IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE R-5 AS ANNX-Y-3 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing the undated order at Annexure-W passed by the Special Tahsildar, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore, in RRT(D)/CR/462/2019-20, in respect of the subject land. 2. The learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6 to 14 submitted that the very same order was challenged before the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division, Bangalore, in RA/BNT-61/2024, which came to be dismissed. Petitioner No.5 herein was - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31028 WP No. 5787 of 2020 appellant No.4 before the Assistant Commissioner, and petitioner No.4 herein was appellant No.1 before the Assistant Commissioner. 3. In that view of the matter, the petitioners herein have not disclosed about the dismissal of the appeal before the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division, Bangalore, and have committed a fraud against this Court by suppressing the true facts. 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.25,000/-, payable by the petitioners to the Chief Minister’s Welfare Fund within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59