SMT GAYATRAMMA v. MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WP/24686/2025 · 2026-06-24
R Nataraj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24368 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24368 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31440 WP No. 24686 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 24686 OF 2025 (LA-UDA) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. GAYATRAMMA W/O LATE SIDDAYYA @ NEELI SIDDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.
2.
SMT. KAMAKSHI D/O LATE SIDDAYYA @ NEELI SIDDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
3.
SRI. PURUSHOTTAM S.
S/O SIDDAIAH @ NEELI SIDDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O NO.1657, A.K. COLONY, KYATAMARANAHALLI, MYSORE - 570019 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YATNAL PARASAPPA GURAPPA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JHANSI RANI LAKSMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570005 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
2.
THE SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570005
3.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570005
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31440 WP No. 24686 of 2025
4.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
AS PER ORDER DATED 23.10.2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3;
NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN RESPECT OF RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO TAKE AN ACTION ON APPLICATION DATED 05.04.2025 HEREBY PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER NO.1 FOR GRANT OF SITE FOR ALTERNATIVE HOUSE AS PER SCHEME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners though the petition is called twice in the day.
Hence, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14