Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24364 (HP)

NEELAM SHARMA v. ASHISH KUMAR KOHLI

COPC/1494/2026 · 2026-09-25

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:41376 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1494 of 2026 IN CWP No.7935 of 2026 Decided on: 25.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Neelam Sharma .....Petitioner Versus Ashish Kumar Kohli ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the order dated 19.05.2026 [Annexure C-1], passed by this Court, in CWP No.7935 of 2026, titled as Neelam Sharma Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, whereby, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the Competent Authority to decide the representation [Annexure P-2 (colly) annexed with the said writ petition], in terms of the contents therein, within twelve weeks. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:41376 that the Respondents-Competent Authority has not decided the representation and no such speaking order has been passed and conveyed to the petitioner, as yet. 3. Heard. 4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of sole respondent. 5. As prayed by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Court disposes of the instant petition, with a direction to the Respondent-Competent Authority to decide the representation in terms of the order dated 19.05.2026 [Annexure C-1], within six weeks, from today [if not already decided] and in case, the order has already been passed, a speaking order be conveyed to the petitioner, within the same time and notices issued to the respondents shall stand discharged, accordingly. 6. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 25, 2026 [Bhardwaj]