APHC010486712018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22846/2018 Between: 1. GORREMUCHU JONESH,, S/O.MARIYA DASU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O.SRUNGARAPET, PERALA, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. GORREMUCHU ANIL KUMAR,, S/O.JONESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, R/O.SRUNGARAPET, PERALA, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. GORREMUCHU VIJAYAMMA,, W/O.LATE SUDHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O.SRUNGARAPET, PERALA, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. GORREMUCHU ASHIRVADHAM,, S/O.LATE SUDHAKAR RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.SRUNGARAPET, PERALA, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. GORREMUCHU SUBBA RAO,, S/O. LATE SUDHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.SRUNGARAPET, PERALA, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. GORREMUCHU RAJU,, S/O. LATE SUDHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.SRUNGARAPET, PERALA, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (ASSIGNMENT) 2 JS, J W.P.No.22846/2018 DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE LEVEL GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, R/O.D.NO 22-19, FLOOR II, BLOCK A, JASTHI TOWERS, SAI PURAM COLONY ROAD, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 521225. 3. DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM- DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE REVENUE DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. TAHSILDAR, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. SUB REGISTRAR, CHIRALA TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent in Re.No.C1/1005/2017(CSS and LRS), dated 01-12-2017 under which rejected to delete the land for an extent of Ac.3.75 cents in Survey No.225/1A of Chirala Revenue village and Mandal of Prakasam District from annexure in G.O.Ms.No.198 (Revenue Assn.I) Department, dated 05-05-2016 being maintained by the respondents under section 22-A (1)(e) of Registration Act, 1908, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, irrational, without jurisdiction, violative of provisions of The Registration Act set aside the same and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to delete the land from the annexure G.O.Ms.No.198 (Revenue Assn.I) Department, dated 05-05-2016 being maintained by the respondents as prohibitory property list of Chirala Revenue village and Mandal of Prakasam District for an extent of Ac.3.75 cents in Survey No.225/1A of aforesaid village and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 3 JS, J W.P.No.22846/2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 6th respondent to receive and register any deed of conveyance being presented by the petitioners without reference to prohibitory property list in annexure in G.O.Ms.No.198 (Revenue Assn.I) Department, dated 05-05- 2016 for an extent of Ac.3.75 cents in Survey No.225/1A of Chirala Revenue village and Mandal of Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 4 JS, J W.P.No.22846/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.Battula Sanjaiah Gandhi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 30.01.2026 rsd 5 JS, J W.P.No.22846/2018 1 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22846/2018 Date: 30.01.2026 rsd