Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24354 (AP)

A. Ganesan v. APSRTC

WP/11925/2013 · 2026-01-18

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010490262013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11925/2013 Between: 1. A. GANESAN,, S/O. M. ANNIAPPAN, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC: JR. ASST (MATERIAL), E.NO.504612, R/O. 16-3-380, LIC COLONY, HARINADH PURAM, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APSRTC, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BUS BHAVAN, RTC 'X' ROAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APSRTC NELLORE ZONE NELLORE, - 3. THE DY CHIEF PERSONNEL MANAGER, APSRTC, NELLORE ZONE, NELLORE. 4. A B S MANYAM, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC: JR. ASST. (MAT), E.NO.505005, R/O. TIRUPATI, WORKING IN THE OFFICE OF REGIONAL STORES, APSRTC, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. Y S VASULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC: JR. ASST(MAT), E.NO.510532, R/O. NELLORE, O/O. ZONAL STORES, APSRTC ZONAL WORKSHOP, NELLORE ZONE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. Y MURALI, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: JR. ASST (MAT), E.NO.512460, R/O. TIRUPATI, WORKING IN THE OFFICE OF REGIONAL STORES, APSRTC, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, TIRUPATI, 2 CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. K R K RAJU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC: JR. ASST (MAT), E. NO. 512622, R/O. TIRUPATI, O/O. CONTROLLER OF STORES, REGIONAL STORES, APSRTC, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. A S J PRASAD, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC: JR. ASST. (MAT), E.NO. 512623, R/O. TIRUPATI, WORKING IN THE OFFICE OF REGIONAL STORES, APSRTC, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR 2. ARUN KUMAR LATHKER(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4 to 8 submits that the petitioner is challenging the promotion to the unofficial respondents to the post of Junior Assistant (Material). 3. It is submitted that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation and that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further. Considering the said submission and the prayer of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is the promotion awarded to the respondent Nos.4 to 8. 4. In view of the petitioner attained the age of superannuation, the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further. 5. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.19.01.2026 SR