Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010490792015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 41830/2015 Between:
1. CHAKKA RAMANAIAH,, S/O. MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, EX.PRESIDENT, EASTERN CHANNEL DISTRIBUTARY COMMITTEE NO.1, BUCHIREDDYPALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER MAJOR IRRIGATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IRRIGATION & COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT, ERRAMANZIL, HYDERABAD.
3. THE SUPERINTENDING IRRIGATION COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION & COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT, CENTRAL DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
5. THE PAY ACCOUNTS OFFICER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the payment to works executed by the petitioner i.e., removal of shoals and water hyginth from the canal bed of Eastern Channel from K.M.8.2 K.M. 13.900 in Kodavalur Mandal, with agreement No.24DNDC/0&M/20-11-2012 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to release the payments forthwith for the work mentioned in the representation dt.05.10.2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 53958 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the payment to the petitioner in respect of the work i.e., removal of shoals and water hyginth from the canal bed of Eastern Channel from K.M.8.2 K.M.
2 13.900 in Kodavalur Mandal, with agreement No.24DNDC/0&M/20-11- 12, mentioned in representation dt.05.10.2015, pending disposal of the WP Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING (AP)
2. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.41830 of 2015
ORDER:
The writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents in not releasing the payment for the works executed by the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, across the Bench, submitted that the respondent authorities have paid the due amount for the works executed by the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in the writ petition to adjudicate further.
4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.01.2026
KBN
4
37 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 41830 of 2015
Date: 06.01.2026
KBN