APHC010488332024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26683/2024 Between: 1. L SUHAIL AHMED, , S/O. KALEEL AHMED, AGED 43 YEARS. JUNIOR ASSISTANT ( UNDER ORDERS OF REMOVAL FROM SERVICE) PRINCIPAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGES COURT, KURNOOL R/O.H NO. 40/312, BHAGYANAGAR, KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER AND 1. HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL, NELAPADU, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR ( ADMINISTRATION ) NELAPADU, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. HE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY CUM PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDG, , KUNROOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering and disposing of the Appeal dated 30.9.2022 preferred by the Petitioner as against the orders of removal from service in DE No. 10/2021 in Dis No. 4512/2022 dated 8.9.2022 which imposed the penalty of removal from service by the 3rd respondent herein by withholding the statutory provisions laid down in the G 0 Ms No. 260 GAD dated 4.9.2023 and G 0 Ms No. 11 Finance Department, dated 13.1.2004 and Article 311(1) and Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the Principles of natural justice and also various judgments of this Honble Court and for a consequential direction directing the 2nd Respondent herein to consider and dispose of the Appeal dated 30.9.2022 preferred by the Petitioner herein forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent herein to consider and dispose of the Appeal dated 30.9.2022 preferred by the Petitioner as against the orders of the 3rd respondent passed in DE No. 10/2021 in Dis No. 4512/2022 dated 8.9.2022 duly considering the representation submitted by the Petitioner dated 24.8.2023 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G VIVEKANAND The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on 30.09.2022. 2. Sri G. Vivekanand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the said appeal has been disposed of on 04.02.2026. 3. In that view of the matter, nothing further survives in this Writ Petition and it is accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 05.02.2026 MJA 7 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26683/2024 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 05.02.2026 MJA