DHARMARAJ YADAV ALIAS CHHOTU YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/285/2026 · 2026-03-11
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2434 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2434 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:6380-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 285 of 2026
---
Dharmaraj Yadav @ Chhotu Yadav, s/o Late Brijal Yadav @ Brijalal Yadav @ Brijlal Yadav, resident of Village 10 No. Khatal, PO & PS Putki, District Dhanbad
… … Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Respondent
---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
---
For the Appellant : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Special P.P.
---
2/11.03.2026 Heard Mr. Pratiush Lala, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Special P.P. appearing for the State.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 09.02.2026 passed in B. P. No. 24 of 2026 arising out of Putki P. S. Case No. 130 of 2025 by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
It has been alleged that some unknown miscreants had thrown bomb at the workplace of the informant causing panic amongst the workers of the company who carried out the work of the production of coal at Gopalichak Colliery.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has been implicated on account of some information given by a spy and he further submitted that the said spy had also taken the name of Adarsh Kumar Paswan who has been granted bail by this court in Cr. Appeal (DB) Filing No. 4467 of 2026. He also submits that the appellant is in custody since 30.12.2025. Learned Special P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant and the fact that one of the similarly situated co-accused has been
-2- granted bail by this court, we while setting aside the order dated 09.02.2026 passed in B. P. No. 24 of 2026, direct that the appellant above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Putki P. S. Case No. 130 of 2025.
This appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 11th March 2026 R. Shekhar Cp 3 Uploaded on 13.03.2026