Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24339 (JHR)

GULAM @ GULAM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8054/2026 · 2026-08-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:25901] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8054 of 2026 ------ Gulam @ Gulam Ansari, aged about 22 years, S/O Asgar Ansari, Resident of Village- Alipur, P.O.- Munkeri & P.S.- Chhatarpur, District- Palamau .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-28-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.356 of 2026 arising out of Lohsinghna P.S. Case No.178 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in selling the stolen Scorpio Vehicle. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Mumtaj Ansari. It is also submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6822 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Hazaribagh in connection with S.T. Case No.356 of 2026 arising out of Lohsinghna P.S. Case No.178 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-28.08.2026-Animesh/