Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24336 (KAR)

SRI BYRANNA v. SMT. BHAGYAMMA

MFA/8511/2025 · 2026-06-19

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30702 MFA No. 8511 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8511 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI BYRANNA S/O. LATE NARASAIAH AGE ABOUT 55 YEARS. 2. SRI T. B. NARSEGOWDA S/O. BYRANNA AGE ABOUT 25 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT THADASIGHATTA VILLAGE THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMLANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI R. SHAMA,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O. LATE GANGANARASAMMA W/O. T. M. SIDDABYRAPPA AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS. 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA @ SIDDAGANGAMMA D/O. LATE GANGANARASAMMA W/O. S. C. MUTHEGOWDA AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT THADASIGHATTA VILLAGE THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30702 MFA No. 8511 of 2025 BANGLORE RURAL DISTRICT. 3. SRI SRINIVAS S/O. LATE HANUMANTAHIAH AGE ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDENT AT OBALAPURA VILLAGE THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF THE CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.03.2012 PASSED ON I.A NO.1 IN O.S.NO.262/2011 BY I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Registry has raised objection regarding maintainability of the appeal on the ground that the valuation of the appeal is less than ₹10,00,000/- and therefore, the appeal is barred under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964. Hence, the objection raised by Registry is sustained. Consequently, the appeal is held to be not maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30702 MFA No. 8511 of 2025 2. Liberty is reserved to the appellants to file such proceedings as may be permissible in law before the appropriate Forum. 3. The time spent in agitating the matter before this Court, shall be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11