Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24334 (JHR)

ARMAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7091/2026 · 2026-08-28

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26061 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7091 of 2026 --------- Arman Khan, Aged about 29 years, Son of-Gulam Sharvar, Resident of Vill.-Rakshi P.O. and P.S.-Ramkanda, Dist.-Garhwa ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-28.08.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) BNS, 2023 in connection with Ramkanda P.S. Case No. 38/2025 corresponding to S.T. No. 42/2026. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the informant has not supported the case of the prosecution and there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. He further submits that only 5 witnesses have been examined out of 11 charge-sheeted witnesses and there is no chance of early conclusion of trial in near future and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 14.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the fact that the informant has not supported the case of the prosecution and also other witnesses have also not supported the case of the prosecution inasmuch as the claim of the accused that he was out of place of occurrence, has not been disputed by these witnesses and also having regard to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 14.10.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Garhwa in connection with Ramkanda P.S. Case No. 38/2025 corresponding to S.T. No. 42/2026. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) AUGUST 28, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 29/08/2026