Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24328 (JHR)

CHHOTU RAWANI ALIAS CHHOTU KUMAR ALIAS CHHOTU KUMAR RAWANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7413/2026 · 2026-08-24

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25586 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7413 of 2026 Chhotu Rawani @ Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu kumar Rawani, aged about 21 years, son of Jageshwar Ram, R/O- village-Bharkhatta, P.O.- Bharkhatta, P.S.- Birni, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Victim X, D/o Y, Resident of XYZ … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Advocate --- 03/24th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Birni P.S. Case No. 58/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 137(2), 96 of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Special Judge POCSO Act, Giridih. 2. The counter-affidavit filed during the court proceedings is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and is in custody since 27.04.2026. The victim was more than 17 years of age and the petitioner is 21 years of age. There was love affair between the petitioner and the victim. 4. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the victim was taken to Delhi and she also became pregnant. 5. Learned counsel for the State has also opposed the prayer for bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegation made against the petitioner and the fact that the victim was taken to Delhi and she became pregnant, this Court is not inclined to 2026:JHHC:25586 2 enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is hereby rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.08.2026 Uploaded On: 29.08.2026 Mukul/-