APHC010487762022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29766/2022 Between: 1. SYED GOUSPEER,, S/O LATE SYED BASHEENIDDIN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RIO D.NO.2-312, DARGAPET, PENUKONDA TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT (OLD ANANTAPUR DISTRICT) ANDHRA PRADESH - 515 110. 2. SAYYAD JAMEEL AHMAD, S/O JAMALUDDEN, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RIO DARGAPET, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. ASMATHUNNISA, W/O LATE S.BASHEERUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O DARGAPET, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. S.JUGUNUMA, W/O SAYYAD AMJAD BASHA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O BANDE MASJID STREET TADIPATRI, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, A.P. 5. S.RESHMA, W/O S.SHAYYAD SHAMEER, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O DARGAPET, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. S.RUHI, W/O SAYYAD DADAPEER, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RIO DARGAPET, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 7. S.SALMA, W/O SAYYAD KAMRU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RIO DARGAPET, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 8. S.SHANAWAZ, S/O SAYYAD NAJEERUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, DARGAPET, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 9. SYED KHAJAPEER, S/O SAYYAD BHASHEERUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RIO PENUKONDA, PENUKONDA, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, NELAPADU, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. GULZARPET, ANANTAPUR, A.P 2 - 515 001 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONE TOWN, NEAR DHARA SHOP, KESAVA COLONY, GUNTAKAL, A.P - 515 801 4. SYED HAYATH BASHA KHADRI, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC SERVICE, RIO HANUMESH NAGAR, GUNTAKAL,ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SYEDA FAIZ PASHA, D/O .SYED HAYATH BASHA KHADRI AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RIO HANUMESH NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly like one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent Police (a)in interfering in matrimonial/civil disputes and thereby pressurizing the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.14,00,000/- (Rupees fourteen lakhs only) to the Fourth Respondent (b)in calling the Petitioners to the I-Town Police Station, Guntakal and detaining them for days together without there being any Crime/ FIR registered (c)in not considering the Representation made by the First Petitioner dated 03.09.2022 being illegal, unlawful, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, vitiated by bias, violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Police not to interfere in matrimonial/civil disputes and call the Petitioners to the police station and pressurize the Petitioners to pay Rs.14,00, 000/- (Rupees fourteen lakhs only) to the Fourth Respondent and to take appropriate disciplinary action against the Third Respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly like one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent Police (a)in interfering in matrimonial/civil disputes and thereby pressurizing the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.14,00,000/- (Rupees fourteen lakhs only) to the Fourth Respondent (b)in calling the Petitioners to the I-Town Police Station, Guntakal and detaining them for days together without there being any Crime/ FIR registered (c)in not considering the Representation made by the First Petitioner dated 03.09.2022 being illegal, unlawful, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, vitiated by bias, violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondent Police not to interfere in matrimonial/civil disputes and call the Petitioners to the police station and pressurize the Petitioners to pay Rs.14,00,000/- (Rupees fourteen lakhs only) to the Fourth Respondent and to take appropriate disciplinary action against the Third Respondent and to pass ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that based on the complaint given by respondent No.5, respondent No.3 registered a case in Crime No.111 of 2022 against the Petitioners and for the said purpose, Petitioners were called to the Police Station for investigation and that respondent Police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the parties and did not pressurize the petitioners to the amounts to respondent No.4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 29766 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*