APHC010488322008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 947/2008 Between: 1. DR. RAVELLA JAYACHANDRA NAIDU, S/O. VENKAARAMANAIDU MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. RAJYALAXMI NURSING HOME, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR. ...APPELLANT AND 1. KOTHURU LALITHADEVI, W/O. JANARDHANA GUPTA HOUSEWIFE R/O. H.NO. 16, J.B.I.COLONY, NEAR J.K.C. COLLEGE, GUNTUR. 2. KOTHURU LALITHADEVI, W/O. LATE JAGAT PRABHU HOUSEWIFE C/O. BOGGAVARAPU GARATAYYA, CHINNAMANGALABHAVI STREET, 1ST LANE, GUTURUVARITHOTA, GUNTUR. 3. KOTHURU BALA KRISHNA, S/O. JANARDHAN GUPTA BUSINESS R/O. D.NO.MUTHY BUNGALOW, OPP: RING ROAD, GUNTUR. 4. KOTHURU KALA NIDHI, W/O. JANARDHAN GUPTA BUSINESS R/O. D.NO.MUTHY BUNGALOW, OPP: RING ROAD, GUNTUR. 5. LAKSHMI VILAS BANK GUNTUR, REP BY ITS MANAGER, GUNTUR. 6. RAJESH KUMAR JAIN, S/O. SHA MANOHARMAL R/O. KONERU, R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. 7. VIKRAM KUMAR JAIN, S/O. SHA MANOHARMAL R/O. KONERU, R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. 8. RAMEELA, D/O. SHA MANOHARMAL R/O. KONERU, 2 R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. 9. RANGEETHA, D/O. SHA MANOHARMAL R/O. KONERU, R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. (RR 6 TO 9 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES) ...RESPONDENT(S): to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 3-9- 2008 in O.S. No. 58 of 1993 in the Court of 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur in the interests of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 2804 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to alienate the plaint schedule property in O.S. No. 58 of 1993 on the file of the 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur during the pendency of the above appeal and may pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to deem fit and proper in the interests of justice and equity. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(ASMP 2258 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to add Smt. M.Vasundhara wife of Mohana Murali who is the daughter of the 1st respondent and Smt. Eranti Neeraja @ Bhavani, wife of E.Vara Prasad who is daughter' daughter as respondents 10 & 11 to the appeal in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to close the A.S.No. 947 of 2008 as the matter is settled out of the Court in pursuance of the sale deeds dated 24.10.2025 vide Doc.Nos. 14887/2025 and 14886/2025. In view of that, the matter as “settled out of the court” and to pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI 2. P DHARMESH 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY 2. RAJA REDDY KONETI 3. K MALLIKARJUNA RAO The Court made the following: 4 Judgment: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant herein has filed an application in I.A. No. 1 of 2026 seeking to close A.S. No. 947 of 2008 on the ground that the matter has been settled out of Court in pursuance of the Sale Deeds dated 24.10.2025, registered as Document Nos. 14887/2025 and 14886/2025. 2. Recording the same, this Appeal Suit is closed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 19.02.2026 PNS 5