APHC010489642015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7849/2015 Between: 1. E.CHANDRAVATHI, W/O. LATE GHOUSE AHMED, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: TAHSILDAR, KONAKANAMITLA VILLAGE 86 MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONAKANAMITLA POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PODILI PRAKASAM DISTRICT, - 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKSAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in summoning the petitioner to the 2nd respondent office contrary to section 160 Cr.P.C. for purpose of conducting investigation in Crime No. 10/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police station and thereby harassing the petitioner by detaining hours together in the police office as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station by issuing notice u/s 160 Cr.P.C. in Crime No. 10/2015 on the file of the 151 respondent police station in the interest of justice 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 10358 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station by issuing notice LI/ s 160 Cr.P.C. in Crime No. 10/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police station pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION No.7849 of 2015 ORDER: Sri D. Kumar Naik, learned counsel, representing Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this case. 2. The submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 06.02.20296 PGR 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.No.7849 of 2015 Date: 06.02.2026 PGR