Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24316 (AP)

Pudi Chaitanya, S/o. Pudi Sai Shankar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.

WP/12175/2015 · 2026-01-06

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010487742015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.12175 OF 2015 Between: Pudi Chaitanya ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare and others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. C SUDESH ANAND 3. A PRABHAKAR RAO The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief. <…….To issue an appropriate order, Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the caste certificate of the petitioner Pudi Chaitanya, vide SRK, J W.P.No.12175 of 2015 2 SSID:0335000080452905, Certificate No.117/08, dated 15th July, 2008, issued by the Tahsildar, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, regarding their social status of Beda Jangam (SC Category) for admission into Medicine and Engineering Courses in EAMCET-2015 (Medical Stream) and other courses, as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for admission in EAMCET-2015 (Medical Stream) conducted by respondents 2 and 3 to their regular courses in the SC category on the basis of the Caste Certificate issued to the petitioner by the Tahsildar, Kasimkota Mandal, Visakhapatnam.= 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:07.01.2026 Nsr SRK, J W.P.No.12175 of 2015 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.12175 of 2015 Date:07.01.2026 Nsr