2026:JHHC:26026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7129 of 2026 Mangal Singh, Aged about 39 Years, Son of Rama Singh, Resident of Village- Ganiyari Khurd, P.O.- Ganiyari Kala, P.S.-Dhurki, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate --- 07/29th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No. 135/2025 (S.T. No. 172/2026) for the offence registered under Section 115(2), 126(2), 108, 352 of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Nagar Untari, Garhwa. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage was solemnized in the year 2009 and the couple was issueless, due to which there used to be altercation and quarrel between the husband and wife. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased and as per the FSL report, the deceased died due to poisoning. The statement of the deceased’s sister-in-law (Gotni), recorded in paragraph 51, reveals that the deceased had consumed poison herself while the petitioner was not present at home. The charge has been framed for alleged offence under Section 108 and 85 of BNS. The petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2026 and there is no likelihood that the petitioner may tamper with the evidence. 3. Learned counsel for the State as well as the Informant have opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that due to quarrel, deceased consumed poison and subsequently died. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the marriage was solemnized way back in the year 2009, the 2026:JHHC:26026 2 statement of the witness recorded in paragraph 51 reveals that the petitioner was not present at home at the time of the alleged occurrence when the deceased consumed poison, and the fact that the charge has already been framed and there is no likelihood of the petitioner tampering with the evidence, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No. 135/2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.08.2026 Uploaded On: 29.08.2026 Mukul/-