Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24313 (AP)

Mandalapu Rajendraprasad v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/7198/2021 · 2026-02-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010488592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7198/2021 Between: 1.MANDALAPU RAJENDRAPRASAD,, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC - CULTIVATION, R/O. 1-91, NUZVID ROAD, VISANNAPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.MANDALAPU AMMAJI,, W/O. RAJENDRAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC - HOUSEWIFE, R/ O. 1-91, NUZVID ROAD, VISANNAPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER WOMEN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 2.MANDALAPU VARANI, W/O. M RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC - HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 17-260/1, GANESH NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.Dr MAJJI SURI BABU 2 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.4455 of 2022. Considering that four years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioners have not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioners are either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if they are so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 17.02.2026 VTS