Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24311 (HP)

RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CMP-T/354/2026 · 2026-09-24

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RAMESH KUMAR Versus STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER CMP-T-354 of 2026 24.09.2026 Present: Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondents-State. While placing on record communication dated 23.09.2026, issued under the signatures of Director Health Services, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, viz-a-viz directions contained in the judgment sought to be executed, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Application stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 24, 2026 (Sunil)