Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24310 (KAR)

SRI. RAJENDRAKUMAR T.C., v. SHARADA VIVIDODESHA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA BANK

CRL.RP/1259/2024 · 2026-06-29

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32157 CRL.RP No. 1259 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1259 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAJENDRAKUMAR T.C., S/O DYAVAPPA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O MALALI JAYANAGARA, MELINABESIDGE POST, HOSANAGARA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577418. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASAD B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHARADA VIVIDODESHA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA BANK, HOSANAGARA BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY MANAGER, MR. D.N.RAJATH S/O LATE KRISHNA, MANAGING DIRCTOR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O KODURU, HOSANGARA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577418, …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SHWETHA NAYAK N., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 (FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNNS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 04.08.2023 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32157 CRL.RP No. 1259 of 2024 AND JMFC AT HOSANAGARA IN C.C.NO.1253/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 06.03.2024 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA SITTING AT SAGAR IN CRL.A.NO.10052/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGE LEVELED AGAINST HIM. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner is not pursuing the matter. On 18.06.2026, though the learned counsel for the revision petitioner made the submission that already they have settled the matter and paid the entire amount and he will produce the certified copy of the same and sought time, not produced the certified copy of the order sheet. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed in view of the earlier submission and also the submission made by the learned counsel today. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8