Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010486072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 374/2025 Between: 1.NIMMAGADDA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, HINDUS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT MOTADAKA VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.NIMMAGADDA MOHANA LAKSHMI,, W/O. VEERANJANEYULU, HINDUS, BUSINESS, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS BUSINESS, RESIDING AT MOTADAKA VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.GADAMSETTY NAGARJUNA, S/o. Chinna Subbaiah, Hindu, aged about 52 years, Business, R/o. Padurapalli, Nellore city and District, Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased toPleased to withdraw the Suit in O.S. No. 90 of 2025 on the file of the Honble I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore and transfer of the same to the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge Court, Mangalagiri for trial and disposal of same in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 90 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.DODDALA YATHINDRA DEV Counsel for the Respondent:
1.N SRIRAM MURTHY The Court made the following:
ORDER: Today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and has also endorsed the same on the grounds in the bundle to that effect.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to move a fresh application, if necessary. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.19.01.2026 CVD