APHC010488162017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 754/2017 Between: 1. E.RAMANA, KURNOOL CITY.,, S/O CHINNA RAMAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, A.R.P.C. 484, WORKING AT KADAPA, R/O Q.NO.S/11-112B, A.P.S.P. CAMP, KURNOOL CITY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. E VIJAYA KUMARI KURNOOL CITY 4 OTRS, W/O E.RAMANNA, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.51/980-231, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR PADMASRI PUBLIC SCHOOL, INDIRAGANDHI NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY. 2. E AKHILA, D/O E.RAMANNA, AGED 21 YEARS, R/O D.NO.51/980-231, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR PADMASRI PUBLIC SCHOOL, INDIRAGANDHI NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY. 3. E YAMINI, D/O E.RAMANNA, AGED 19 YEARS, R/O D.NO.51/980-231, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR PADMASRI PUBLIC SCHOOL, INDIRAGANDHI NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY. 4. E DEEPIKA, D/O E.RAMANNA, AGED 18 YEARS, R/O D.NO.51/980-231, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR PADMASRI PUBLIC SCHOOL, INDIRAGANDHI NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY. 5. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Revision by setting aside the order dated 6.12.2016, passed in Crl.M.P.40/2015 in F.C.O.P.No.16/2007, on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Kurnool and consequently dismiss the Crl.M.P.40/2015, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1227 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order 06-122016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.40 2015 in F.C.O.P.No.16 of 2007, on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Kurnool, pending disposal of Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y JAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VARUN BYREDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.754 of 2017 ORDER: Sri Y. Jaya Raju, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, would submit that the revision petitioner/husband is no more. 2. Sri T. Nikhilesh, learned counsel representing Sri Varun Byreddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4, is present. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the 5th respondent–State is also present. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed as abated. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 30th January, 2026 cbn 4 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 754 OF 2017 30th January, 2026 cbn