Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 243 (DEL)

YASMIN & ANR. v. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ORS.

CRL.M.C./1706/2026 · 2026-03-10

Anup Jairam Bhambhani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 1706/2026 Page 1 of 3 $~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1706/2026 YASMIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohd. Anis Ur Rehman, Advocate with petitioners (in-person). versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Ms. Sana Ansari, Mr. I. Ahmed, Advocate for R-3 with R-3 (in- person). SI Sanjay Bansal, P.S.: Darya Ganj. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 10.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 6949/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 1706/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No.0004/2021 dated 05.01.2021 registered under sections 354(A)/506/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) at P.S.: Darya Ganj, Central Delhi. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:05:33 CRL.M.C. 1706/2026 Page 2 of 3 2. The petition is premised on Settlement Agreement dated 29.04.2025 whereby the petitioners and respondent No. 3 have resolved the matter amicably. 3. The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioners and of respondent No. 3, alongwith proof of their IDs. 4. The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel. 5. The court has interacted with the respondent No.3 as also with petitioners who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and a Settlement Agreement dated 29.04.2025 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward. 6. Mr. Shoaib Haider, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed. 7. In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:05:33 CRL.M.C. 1706/2026 Page 3 of 3 8. Accordingly case FIR No.0004/2021 dated 05.01.2021 registered under sections 354(A)/506/323/34 IPC at P.S.: Darya Ganj, Central Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 9. Petition stands disposed-of. 10. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J MARCH 10, 2026 ss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:05:33