Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24286 (JHR)

TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD. REP. THRO ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, DEBASISH DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/734/2026 · 2026-08-28

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25960 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 734 of 2026 --- TATA Capital Housing Finance Limited having its registered office at Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, P.O. & P.S.- Lower Parel, District- Mumbai (Maharashtra) having one of its Branch offices at Bistupur, Jamshedpur, represented through its Authorized Officer Debasish Das … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajiv Ranjan, the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur …. … Opp. Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chiranjeev Bhadoria, Advocate For the Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. Ankit Kumar, A.C. to S.C.-I Order No. 04 Dated: 28.08.2026 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 alleging willful violation of order dated 30.07.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 3215 of 2025. 2. Mr. Ankit Kumar, learned A.C. to S.C.-I appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, refers to order as contained in memo no. 654(A) dated 12.08.2026 (Annexure-A to the show cause affidavit dated 25.08.2026) issued by the said opposite party in Sarfaesi File No. XXVII-17/2018-19 and submits that the aforesaid order of this Court has now been complied as the application under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been disposed of. 3. Mr. Chiranjeev Bhadoria, learned counsel for the petitioner, accepts the said fact. 2026:JHHC:25960 2 4. Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, there is no need to further proceed in the present matter. 5. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 is hereby dropped. 6. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) August 28, 2026 Ritesh/ Uploaded on 29.08.2026