Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24286 (CHH)

SMT. RAJMATI DEVI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/263/2023 · 2026-06-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26830 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 263 of 2023 1 - Smt. Rajmati Devi W/o Subhasjh Singh Mourya Aged About 50 Years Mourya, R/o Village Ghatiya Khurd, Post Godgiri, Tahsil Dhamda, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Districr Collector District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3 - Tahsildar Dhamda, Sub Tahsil Ahiwara District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - Khilawan Rawat R/o Village Ghatiya Khurd, Post Godgiri, Tahsil Dhamda, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/07/2026 RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction or order to the respondent No.3 to entered the name of the petitioner in revenue records which land of Khsara No.25 rabka 1.04 hect. of parwari halka no. 37 of village Ghatiya khurd, thasil Dhamdha Dist. Durg after set-aside the order date 23/5/2022 filed as Annexure P/1. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondent No.3 to produced the entire record within time limit as prescribed under the law. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit 2 and proper according to the facts and circumstances of the case along with the cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that, against the order passed by the concerned Tahsildar, the petitioner has already preferred an appeal under Section 44(1) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code before the competent Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), and the said appeal is presently pending for consideration and as such learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition 3 with liberty to pursue the appeal which is pending before the concerned SDO ( R ). 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat