I.N.V.Mohan, S/o. M.P.Naganna v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
WP/4734/2013 · 2026-02-08
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24282 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24282 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010487332013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 4734/2013 Between:
1. I.N.V.MOHAN, S/O. M.P.NAGANNA,, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BRAHMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SAIIABAD, HYDERABAD.
2. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS, OFFICER OF THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS, BOGGULAGUNTA, HYDERABAD.
3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BRAHMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings R.Dis.No.B1/21342/2012 dated 6.2,2013 issued by the 2nd respondent, whereunder the post of Assistant commissioner was created, but no cadre strength was fixed and ordered for inclusion in the vacancies of Assistant Executive officers (AEOs) as illegal, unconstitutional and improper, and consequently to set-aside the creation of
2
posts of Assistant Commissioner itself without fixing cadre strength and mode of appointment, IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 5912 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings R.Dis.No.Bl/21342/2012 dated 6.2.2013 issued by the 2nd respondent:, in so far as filling up of Assistant Commissioner is concerned, pending disposal of the above writ petition, Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION)
2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
3. A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS) The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.02.2026 PNS