Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24280 (CHH)

RAMPRASAD v. JALESHWAR RAM

FA/84/2020 · 2026-06-29

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 84 of 2020 1 - Ramprasad S/o Gulab Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Seema D/o Ramnath Aged About 16 Years (Minor) Through Natural Guardian Ramprasad S/o Gulab, R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Tilaso Wd/o Gulab Aged About 64 Years, R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri , District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Jaleshwar Ram S/o Ganpat Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.. (Plaintiff) 2 - Smt. Jeera W/o Bhuleshwar Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Chulhapani, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Tika W/o Madho Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Chulhapani, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 4 - Yudhisthir Das S/o Bimbadhar Das Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 5 - Anak Sai S/o Mahnu Caste Nagwanshi, R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 2 6 - Bablu S/o Lakhan Aged About 42 Years R/o Moto Line Purani Basti Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 7 - Sandeep S/o Lakhan Sao Aged About 40 Years R/o Moto Line Purani Basti Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 8 - Anand S/o Sajjan Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 9 - Salim Knido S/o Silbanus Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Dhodhidand, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 10 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant (s) : None For Respondent No.1 : Shri Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For State : Shri Narayan Prasad, Panel Lawyer ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 30/06/2026 Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.07.02 15:23:32 +0530