SRI CHETHAN.L @ DODDACHETHU @ SETHI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY
CRL.P/10094/2025 · 2026-04-01
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2427 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2427 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17700 CRL.P No. 10094 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10094 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
SRI CHETHAN.L @ DODDACHETHU @ SETHI S/O.LINGIAH S.B AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.739, 2ND CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NAGARABHAVI MAIN ROAD, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, MOODALAPALYA, BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU- 560 072 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N NANDAN., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17700 CRL.P No. 10094 of 2025 ANNAPOORANESHWARI NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU-560 091 REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001
2.
SRI. VINOD S/O. ASHOK, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT NO. 12, KONANAKUNTE, CHUCHENAGHATTA CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560062 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR, COMPLIANT, ENTIRE CAHRGESHEET FILED BY ANNAPOORNESHWARI P.S. IN S.C.NO.906/19 (CR.NO.131/2017) FOR THE O/P/U/S. 341, 363, 342, 307,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17700 CRL.P No. 10094 of 2025 506(B) R/W. 34 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF (CCH-62) LXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGLAURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the proceedings in SC.No.906/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 363, 342, 307, 506(B) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('the IPC' for short).
2. Heard Sri. N. Nandan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Anoop Kumar, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would firmly submit that the charges have been framed and the trial is in progress and would only seek a direction for expeditious disposal of the proceedings of the year 2019.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17700 CRL.P No. 10094 of 2025
4. In that light, there is no warrant of entertainment of the petition except for a direction that the concerned Court shall endeavour to conclude the proceedings, within an outer limit of nine months from the date of receipt of the copy of the
order, if not earlier. Ordered accordingly.
SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12