Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24269 (HP)

HAPPY GARG v. MS SANJEEV ENTERPRISES

RSA/80/2013 · 2026-09-19

Romesh Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Happy Garg alias Ambrish Garg vs. M/s Sanjeev Enterprises RSA No.80 of 2013. 19.09.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Preetika Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel, for the respondent. It is contended by learned vice counsel for the respondent that the sole proprietor of the respondent, Shri Ravi Bhatia, has expired during the pendency of the appeal. Her said statement is taken on record. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks three weeks’ time to take consequential steps for bringing on record the legal representatives of the sole respondent. List after three weeks. ( Romesh Verma ) Judge 19th September, 2026 (krt)