Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24268 (JHR)

RAJESH KUMAR MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7366/2026 · 2026-08-24

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:25557 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7366 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Aged about 38 years, Son of Raghunath Mishra, Resident of Village- Gounra, Karon, Karogram, P.O & P.S- Deoghar, District-Deoghar (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Azeemuddin, APP --- 06/24.08.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2026 in connection with Tetulmari P.S Case No. 23 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under sections 64(2)(k), 70(1), 351(2),351(3) of BNS pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the charge-sheet has already been submitted. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the victim is mentally and physically challenged and there is direct allegation against the petitioner. He has submitted that the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS be perused by this Court. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is direct allegation made against the 2026:JHHC:25557 2 petitioner and in the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, with the help of interpreter, and the victim has made direct allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. The instant bail application is hereby rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 24.08.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-29.08.2026