Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24267 (AP)

BANDI MAQBUL BASHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24491/2025 · 2026-02-16

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010482172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION N Between: 1. Bandi Maqbul Basha, S/o.B.Jabbar, aged about 35 Years, 127, Kasba Street, Banaganapalle Village and Mandal, Nandyala District, Andhra Pradesh AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Department of Energy District, Andhra Pradesh, Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.24491 OF 2025 Bandi Maqbul Basha, S/o.B.Jabbar, aged about 35 Years, 127, Kasba Street, Banaganapalle Village and Mandal, Nandyala District, Andhra Pradesh – 518124, and five others. AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal of Energy, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Andhra Pradesh, and four others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr.Varun Byreddy Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Energy Mr.Venkata Rama Rao Kota, Standing Counsel for APSPDCL IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Bandi Maqbul Basha, S/o.B.Jabbar, aged about 35 Years, R/o.11- 127, Kasba Street, Banaganapalle Village and Mandal, Nandyala ...Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, , Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur ...Respondents Venkata Rama Rao Kota, Standing Counsel for APSPDCL 2 The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, in the event any new cause of action arises. Permission is granted. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim Order granted on 11.9.2025 stands dissolved. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petition pending, including I.A. No.2 of 2025, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J February 17, 2026 vasu