ROSHAN SANGA ALIAS RAUSHAN SANGA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7892/2026 · 2026-08-25
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24259 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24259 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:25643] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7892 of 2026
------
1. Roshan Sanga @ Raushan Sanga, aged about 22 years, S/o – Late Ratan Sanga, R/o- Village – Chete Kumbatoli, P.O. & P.S. – Nagri, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. Akash Munda @ Akash Horo, aged about 19 years, Son of Anil Horo, R/o – Village – Chete Kumbatoli, P.O. & P.S. – Nagri, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-25-08-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No.61 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, have abducted of the father of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is then submitted by drawing attention to the bail application of the co-accused namely Samir Tirkey @ Sameer Sanjiv Tirkey who was granted bail by this court that therein, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant that after registration of the case, the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and because of mis- understanding, the case was instituted. It is also submitted that the
petitioners are not named in the FIR and without putting them in T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-16 of the bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 30.04.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 29.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.5965 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khunti in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No.61 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 25.08.2026 Saroj/