APHC010485402013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11095/2013 Between: 1. VADDI JAYA PRASAD,, S/O. V.REDDY, HINDU, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC: CONTRACT LABOUR IN VTPS, R/O. DOOR NO.35-168, SRAMIKANAGAR, KONDAPALLI POST, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A P POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD APGENCO, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUT SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD, 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGERHR, A.P.POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD.,(APGENCO) VIDYUT SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more fully one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in letter No.CGM(HR)/DS(O&M)/AS(O&M)/ PO.P/P1/32/2013, dated 08-04-2013 issued by the 2nd respondent illegal, improper, arbitrary and unenforceable besides being opposed to principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear for the trade test to be conducted on 13-04-2013 or any other subsequent date for the post of Junior Plant Attendants in the respondent Corporation and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 13723 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to appear for the trade test to be conducted on 13-04- 2013 for the selection of Junior Plant Attendants in the respondent Corporation pending the above Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SESHARAJYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C RAGHU(SC FOR AP GENCO) 2. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 05.02.2026 PNS