Dade Narayanamma v. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep: by its District Collector
WP/2911/2014 · 2026-01-27
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24254 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24254 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010480362014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2911/2014 Between:
1. DADE NARAYANAMMA, W/O LATE BOGGU KASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCCU: COOLI RIO 20-9A, PARK STREET, CUMBUM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAHAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF WOMEN DEVELOPMENT CHILD WELFARE, DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD.
3. PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN, CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ONGOLE. PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4. THE C D P O I C D C PROJECT BESTAVARIPETA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
5. SMT GADAMSETTY PADMAVATHI, W/O BALA VENKATESWARLU, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 14-48/A, KAPAVEEDHI, CUMBUM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523 333.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
There is no representation for the petitioner today. On 21.01.2026 also, as there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.
It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.28.01.2026. SR