Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24249 (HP)

ANITA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER

COPC/1409/2026 · 2026-09-22

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:40565 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1409 of 2026 IN CWP No.2210 of 2026 Decided on: 22.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Anita Kumari and another .....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar and another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Gauam Sood, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioners have invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the judgment dated 02.03.2026 [Annexure C-1], passed by this Court, in CWP No.2210 of 2026, titled as Anita Kumari and another Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, directing the Competent Authority to decide the representations [annexed with the said writ petition] in terms of the contents therein as well as the judgment being relied upon by the petitioners within twelve weeks. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:40565 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that neither representations have been decided nor a speaking order has been communicated to them as yet. 3. Heard. 4. Notice. Mr. Gautam Sood, Learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 5. In aforesaid circumstances and as prayed by Learned Counsel for petitioners, instant petition, is disposed of, with direction to the Respondents- Competent Authority, to comply with the judgment dated 02.03.2026 [Annexure C-1], by passing a speaking order [if already not passed], within a period of six weeks positively, from today. 6. Needless to say that in case representations have already been decided, the order on the representations/speaking order be conveyed to the petitioners, within the above period. Notices issued to the respondents shall stand discharged, accordingly. 7. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all 3 2026:HHC:40565 the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 22, 2026 [Bhardwaj]