IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 16513 of 2026. Decided on : 23 rd September , 2026 Dr. Sanjiv Raj Singh Kanwar ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Oshin Anand Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 and 4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. Petitioner's grievance is that his representation (Annexure P- 6 Colly.) seeking applicability Anil Kumar Kohli Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2CWPOA No. 83/2020, decided on 28.03.2024. 2 accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to this prayer. Without adverting to the merits of the matter and without examining the issue of delay, laches & acquiescence, if any, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 23rd September, 2026. (jai)