Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24243 (CAL)

KRISHANU MUKHERJEE v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/11356/2026 · 2026-06-17

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 3 19.06.2026 Court. No. 25 suvayan WPA 11356 of 2026 Krishanu Mukherjee Vs. The Election Commission of India & Ors. Mr. Shamik Chatterjee Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata Mr. Sahil Kabir …for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey Mr. G. Pandey …for E.C.I. 1. The matter is listed today under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for correction in the order dated June 17, 2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated June 17, 2026 the names of the learned advocates appearing for the petitioner is inadvertently recorded as “Mr. Samim Ahmed, Mr. Nasirul Hoque and Mr. Khairul Alam” instead of “Mr. Shamik Chatterjee, Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata and Mr. Sahil Kabir”. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the order dated June 17, 2026 the name of the learned advocates for appearing of the petitioner shall be read as “Mr. Shamik Chatterjee, Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata and Mr. Sahil Kabir” instead of “Mr. Samim Ahmed, Mr. Nasirul Hoque and Mr. Khairul Alam”. 4. Let the order be treated as part of the order dated June 17, 2026. (Krishna Rao, J.)