Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24235 (KAR)

SMT MANJULA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18395/2026 · 2026-06-22

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30563 WP No. 18395 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18395 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MANJULA, W/O SAVAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.79, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, 10TH CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, MAHALAXMIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAREN SHAKTI SWARUP M U., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI - 562 110. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30563 WP No. 18395 of 2026 3. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO THEREFORE, THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE, THE PETITIONER RESPECTFULLY PRAYS TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19/02/2024 ANNEXURE-A AND ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER HERE IN THE REVENUE RECORDS RIC EXTRACT AS PER THE JUDGMENT DATED 21/12/2020 PASSED BY ANNEXURE THIS HON'BLE COURT IN ANNEXURE - C IN WP 12887/19 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30563 WP No. 18395 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned AGA accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner seeking writ of mandamus to Respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 19.02.2024 (Annexure-A). 3. Sri.Naren Shakti Swarup.M.U., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner invited attention of this court to the order dated 21.12.2020 in W.P.No.12887 of 2019 (Annexure-C), wherein the suo-motu proceedings initiated in respect of the subject land, as to the grant made in favour of the vendor's vendor of the petitioner, which came to be quashed by this Court, in the order produced at Annexure-C. In that view of the matter, it is made clear that, as on today, the petitioner being the owner of the property in question, requires the change of khatha into his name. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30563 WP No. 18395 of 2026 4. In this regard, the learned AGA submitted that since the property in question is being converted and therefore, Respondent No.3 has no jurisdiction to the said aspect, I am of the view that since the proceedings have been initiated by the Respondent No.2 against the vendor's vendor of the petitioner herein, which has been quashed by this Court as per the order dated 21.12.2020 in W.P.No.12887 of 2019 (Annexure-C), I am of the view that, there is no impediment for the Respondent No.3 to consider the representation at Annexure-A within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. With the above observation, Writ Petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33