( 2026:JHHC:25573 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5775 of 2026 1.Kairi Kayam @ Gulandi daughter of Galu Kayam 2. Rando Boipai @ Kranti son of Behra Boipai … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Birat Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, APP --- 06/24.08.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is in custody, in connection with S.T. Case No. 74 of 2026, arising out of Tonto P.S. Case No. 63 of 2022, for the offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149,307,332,353 of IPC, 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of the CLA Act and 10/13 of the U.A.P. Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, at Chaibasa. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 is the wife and the petitioner no. 2 is the husband. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner no. 1 has no criminal antecedent and both of them are in custody since 25.09.2025 and charge has been framed on 11.05.2026, but no witness has been examined so far. The learned counsel has submitted that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that as per the allegation, due the IED bomb blast planted by the accused persons, one Inspector sustained several injuries and the petitioner no. 2 also has criminal antecedent of similar nature. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of allegation and also the fact that trial has commenced, the petitioner no. 2 has criminal antecedent of similar nature, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner no. 2 namely Rando Boipai @ Kranti is rejected. ( 2026:JHHC:25573 ) 2 6. So far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned, she has no criminal antecedent and she being a lady, the petitioner no. 1 namely Kairi Kayam @ Gulandi is directed to be enlarged on bail on her furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, at Chaibasa, in connection with S.T. Case No. 74 of 2026, arising out of Tonto P.S. Case No. 63 of 2022, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. At this, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that some observation may be made so that the trial be expedited. 8. The State is directed to ensure that the witnesses are promptly produced before the court. 9. The learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this order to the Superintendent of Police of the concerned District and to the Director, Prosecution to ensure compliance. 10. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 11. The instant bail application is partly allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.08.2026 Uploaded on 25.08.2026 Binit/