Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24226 (AP)

Pitta Neelamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh.

WP/22606/2018 · 2026-02-01

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010481742018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22606/2018 Between: 1. PITTA NEELAMMA,, PITTA NEELAMMA, W/O LATE PITTA APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC-AGRICULTURE, R/O SEETHAMVALASA VILLAGE, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT OF A.P., AMARAVATHY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not entering petitic-es name in 1-B register, Adangal and Pattadar Pass Book in respect of land to an extent of Ac 0.56 cents out of Ac 0.62 cents in Sy.No. 2 JS,J W.P.No.22606/2018 43/8 of Seetamvalasa Village, Ranasthalam Mandal, Srikakulam District is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India anc ,consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to enter the name of petitioner in 1-B register, Adangal and Pattadar Pass Book in respect of land to an extent of Ac 0.56 cents out of Ac 0.62 cents in Sy.No. 43/8 of Seetamvalasa Village, Ranasthalam Mandal, Srikakulam District be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents and 3 to enter petitioners name in the revenue records in respect of land to an extent of Ac 0.56 cents out of Ac 0.62 cents in Sy.No. 43/8 of Seetamvalasa Village, Village, Ranasthalam Mandal, Srikakulam District by considering petitioner's representation dt 19.03.2018 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS,J W.P.No.22606/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in not entering petitic-es name in 1-B register, Adangal and Pattadar Pass Book in respect of land to an extent of Ac 0.56 cents out of Ac 0.62 cents in Sy.No. 43/8 of Seetamvalasa Village, Ranasthalam Mandal, Srikakulam District is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India anc ,consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to enter the name of petitioner in 1-B register, Adangal and Pattadar Pass Book in respect of land to an extent of Ac 0.56 cents out of Ac 0.62 cents in Sy.No. 43/8 of Seetamvalasa Village, Ranasthalam Mandal, Srikakulam District be pleased to pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is the wife of the deceased landowner and sought mutation of her name in the revenue records 1-B register, Adangal and Pattadar Pass Book for a total extent of Ac.0.62 cents in Sy.No.43/8 of Seetamvalasa Village, Ranasthalam Mandal, Srikakulam District. She claimed possession and on receipt of compensation for an acquisition of Ac.0.06 cents, yet her name was not reflected in the records for the remaining land of Ac.0.56 cents. Despite approaching authorities and paying challans for a survey, no action was taken. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions submits that petitioner should have followed the procedural requirement of filing Form VI-A 4 JS,J W.P.No.22606/2018 for mutation either at citizen service centre/Meeseva Centre or online for incorporation of changes or mutation in revenue records in terms of Sub-Rule 2 of Rule 18 of The Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989 and further submits that no such application is made by the petitioner and further approached this Court. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to file an application in Form VI-A through Meeseva portal within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order for mutation of her name in the revenue records. Thereafter, respondents shall consider and pass appropriate orders within four (4) weeks thereafter by giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.02.2026 RSD 5 JS,J W.P.No.22606/2018 187 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22606/2018 Dated: 02.02.2026 RSD