Kadali Kalyani, W/o.Chittbabu v. Kadali Chitti Babu
CMA/809/2010 · 2026-02-15
Balaji Medamalli, Ravi Nath Tilhari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24222 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 24222 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (RNT,J &BM,J CMA. NO.809 OF 2010)
APHC010485242010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 809/2010 Between:
1. KADALI KALYANI, W/O.CHITTBABU, D/O.V.VENKATA REDDY R/O.D.NO.4-3-17, MRK PURAM, ANAPARTHI [V] & [M], EAST GOIDAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. KADALI CHITTI BABU, S/o.Ramachandra Rao, Hindu R/o.r.Yenugupalli Village, P.Gannavaram Mandal.
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders
IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 1911 OF 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 924 days in representing CMASR No.2328/2008 on the file of thois Hon'ble Court in the interests of justice Counsel for the Appellant:
1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent:
1. The Court made the following:
2 (RNT,J &BM,J CMA. NO.809 OF 2010)
JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife, challenging the order and decree dated 10.09.2007 passed in O.P.No.18 of 2005 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District, whereby the respondent/husband’s petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was allowed.
2. There is no interim order in the appeal.
3. Record discloses that the matter was placed before the Lok Adalat, but it could not be settled, as both parties were absent.
4. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant.
5. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed “for want of prosecution”.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Date :16.02.2026. RPD.
3 (RNT,J &BM,J CMA. NO.809 OF 2010)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
(DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION)
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 809 OF 2010
Date: 16.02.2026
RPD.