Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24220 (KAR)

SRI A S GIRIDHAR v. SRI T R RAMAIAH

CRL.RP/51/2026 · 2026-06-30

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32352 CRL.RP No. 51 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.51 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A.S. GIRIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O LATE SUNDERSH, R/AT NO.2206, “DHARANI” 13TH MAIN ROAD, CHANDRANAGARA, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT 2ND STAGE, BENGAURU-27. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. S.B.LAKSHMAMMA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. T.R. RAMAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LRS. MR. ARAVIND GAJENDRA C., S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, SRI LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, BASAPPA LAYOUT, NEAR FOOD WORLD, SANJAY NAGAR, RMV EXTENSION 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560094. 2. MR. B.R. YUVARAJ, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32352 CRL.RP No. 51 of 2026 R/AT NO.40, PIPELINE CROSS, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, GOLLARAHATTI, VISWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560091. 3. MR. B.R.VASUDEV MURTHY, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.34, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGE, 2ND PHASE, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, MANJUNATH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA K.B., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 (FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET THE ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE LEARNED VI ADDL. SMALL CAUSE JUDGE AND XXXI ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU (SCCH-2) AT BENGALURU DATED 29.06.2019 WHICH WAS CONFIRMED BY THE LEARNED ADDL LXVIII CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU DATED 04.11.2025. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32352 CRL.RP No. 51 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Both the parties and their respective learned counsel are present before the Court and they have filed a joint memo. In terms of the joint memo, the parties have settled their dispute for a total settlement of Rs.5,85,000/- as full and final settlement. It is stated that the petitioner has already deposited an amount of Rs.4,07,500/- before the Trial Court. Out of that, an amount of Rs.5,000/- shall vest with the State and after deducting the same, the respondents/complainant are entitled for an amount of Rs.4,02,500/- and the petitioner has no objection to release the amount in favour of the respondents before the Trial Court. Today the petitioner has paid the remaining amount of Rs.1,82,500/- to the legal heirs of the respondent/complainant before the Court and the same is acknowledged by the legal heirs of the respondent. In terms of the settlement arrived between the parties, entire amount of Rs.5,85,000/- is paid to the legal heirs of the respondent/complainant. The Trial Court is directed to release the amount of Rs.4,02,500/- to the respondents, on proper - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32352 CRL.RP No. 51 of 2026 identification after deducting an amount of Rs.5,000/- from Rs.4,07,500/- towards the State. 2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the joint memo. The Registry is directed to send the records to the Trial Court forthwith. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37