CRWP-7046-2026 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA JASWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms for the petitioners. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and for restraining the private respondents No 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners petitioners are major and copies of their Aadhaar cards are appended with the petition as Annexures that the petitioners have got married at Gurudwara Sahib Lakhi Shah Vanjara, Forest Hill Near Singha Devi Colony, Tehsil Kharar, Distt. Mohali, Punjab. drawn to the certificate of marriage and photographs, which are appended with the petition as Annexures respondents No 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision: 15 JASWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR ***** Ms. Kavita, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. ***** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and for restraining the private respondents Nos.4 to 9 from interfering in their matrimonial l Learned counsel for the petitioners petitioners are major and copies of their Aadhaar cards are appended with the petition as Annexures P-1 and P-2, as proof of their age. It is further contended oners have got married as per Sikh rites and customs Gurudwara Sahib Lakhi Shah Vanjara, Forest Hill Near Singha Devi Colony, Tehsil Kharar, Distt. Mohali, Punjab. drawn to the certificate of marriage and photographs, which are appended with the petition as Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively. It is argued that respondents Nos.4 to 9 and other relatives are opposed to the marr IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7046-2026 Date of decision: 15.06.2026 ....Petitioners ...Respondents ROHIT KAPOOR The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and for restraining the private from interfering in their matrimonial life. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that both the petitioners are major and copies of their Aadhaar cards are appended with the as proof of their age. It is further contended as per Sikh rites and customs on 31.05.2026 Gurudwara Sahib Lakhi Shah Vanjara, Forest Hill Near Singha Devi Colony, Tehsil Kharar, Distt. Mohali, Punjab. The attention of the Court is drawn to the certificate of marriage and photographs, which are appended with respectively. It is argued that the private other relatives are opposed to the marriage of ....Petitioners ...Respondents filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to the official respondents for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and for restraining the private contends that both the petitioners are major and copies of their Aadhaar cards are appended with the as proof of their age. It is further contended .05.2026 Gurudwara Sahib Lakhi Shah Vanjara, Forest Hill Near Singha Devi The attention of the Court is drawn to the certificate of marriage and photographs, which are appended with the private iage of JYOTI 2026.06.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7046-2026 petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2 and thus, there is a serious threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. It is contended that the petitioners have submitted a representation dated protection of their life and liberty and would be satisfied if at this stage a direction is given to the said respondents to decide the same in accordance with law. 3. Keeping in view the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the present petition is disp representation dated Standard Operating Procedures notified by the State of Punjab vide Notification dated 23.01.2025. 4. It is clarified of the averments made in the present petition, which will be ascertained by the concerned authority, in accordance with law. 5. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 15.06.2026 Jyoti-V Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2026 2 petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2 and thus, there is a serious threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. It is contended that the petitioners have submitted a representation dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P tection of their life and liberty and would be satisfied if at this stage a direction is given to the said respondents to decide the same in accordance with Keeping in view the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 08.06.2026 (Annexure P Standard Operating Procedures notified by the State of Punjab vide Notification dated 23.01.2025. It is clarified that this Court has not commented upon the veracity of the averments made in the present petition, which will be ascertained by the concerned authority, in accordance with law. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2 and thus, there is a serious threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. It is contended that the petitioners have submitted a (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 seeking tection of their life and liberty and would be satisfied if at this stage a direction is given to the said respondents to decide the same in accordance with Keeping in view the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the osed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) strictly in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures notified by the State of Punjab vide Notification that this Court has not commented upon the veracity of the averments made in the present petition, which will be ascertained by the Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No petitioner No.1 with petitioner No.2 and thus, there is a serious threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners. It is contended that the petitioners have submitted a to respondent No.2 seeking tection of their life and liberty and would be satisfied if at this stage a direction is given to the said respondents to decide the same in accordance with Keeping in view the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the osed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the strictly in accordance with the Standard Operating Procedures notified by the State of Punjab vide Notification that this Court has not commented upon the veracity of the averments made in the present petition, which will be ascertained by the JYOTI 2026.06.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document