Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24215 (AP)

K P RANGA REDDY v. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS

CC/4131/2024 · 2026-01-28

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010480022024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4131/2024 Between: 1. K P RANGA REDDY, S/O. GOLLA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. H.NO.3-371, TAPOVANAM, ANNANTHA PURAM ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. K NAGARAJA, CHIEF ENGINEER (PROJECTS), WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, HLC COLONY, ANANTHAPURAMU. 4. N RAJA SEKHAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, T.B.P.H.L.C CIRCLE-LL, ANANTHAPURAM. 5. P REDDY SEKHAR REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HLC (LOC) DIVISION, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURDISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, deliberately, violating and not implementing the orders of the Honble High Court passed in W.P. No. 7097 of 2024 dated 24.04.2023, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DASARI S V V S V PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4131/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 22.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7097 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 22.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7097 of 2024, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 29.01.2026 TTPPSS 4 139 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO:4131 /2024 29.01.2026 TTPPSS