Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 222 CRM-M-33616-2026 Date of Decision.:15.06.2026 Rajesh Kumar
…..Pe..oner Vs. State of Punjab and Another .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The peoner is seeking regular bail by way of peon filed under Secon 439 Cr.P.C in case FIR No.264 dated 10.11.2024 registered under Secon 109 of BNS, 2023 (Secon 307 of the IPC, 1860) and Secons 25 and 27 of Arms Act at Police Staon Rama Mandi, District Police Commissionerate Jalandhar.
2. It is submi8ed by learned counsel for the peoner that peoner is alleged to have used firearm and fired a bullet. However the bullet did not hit the complainant Prince Sharma (respondent No.2). It is further submi8ed by learned counsel that ma8er has since been compromised between the pares vide Annexure P-2 and the pares had earlier filed a quashing peon bearing No.CRM-M-17659-2026 for quashing of FIR in queson. This Court vide order dated 02.04.2026 (Annexure P-3) directed the pares to get their statements recorded before the trial Court and that their statements has already been recorded on 01.06.2026 as per Annexure P-4.
3. Noce of moon.
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-33616-2026
4. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab accepts noce on behalf of respondent No.1- State. Mr. D.S. Bhinder, Advocate put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2/complainant and filed his power of a8orney.
5. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2/complainant could not refute the aforesaid contenons and concedes the aforesaid facts that ma8er has been compromised between the pares and recording of the joint statement before the trial Court.
6. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, but without commenng anything further on the merits of the case, this peon is allowed and peoner is admi8ed to bail on his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the sasfacon of the Learned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, on usual terms and condions.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE June 15, 2024 Neeka Tuteja
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.06.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document