Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 24209 (CHH)

CHHATTISGARH STATE TAEKWONDO ASSOCIATION BILASPUR v. TAEKWONDO FEDRATION OF INDIA

WPC/4769/2022 · 2026-06-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26936 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4769 of 2022 1 - Chhattisgarh State Taekwondo Association Bilaspur Through Its Secretary, Rampuri Goswami, Aged About -52 Years, S/o Late Shri G.P. Goswami, R/o. Diprapara, Near Mama Talab, Ward No. 37, Thana City Kotwali, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Taekwondo Fedration Of India Through Its President. Correspondence Address- Hari Gopal Mazumadar Road, Purana Bazar, Near Telephone Exchange, Dhanbad (Jharkhand), India-826001 2 - Honble Shri Justice G. S. Sistani (Retd.), Court Commissioner - Cum- Returning Officer, Election For Executive Council Of Taekwondo Federation Of India, New Delhi (India) 3 - Chhattisgarh Taekwondo Association (Cta) Through Its General Secretary Anil Dwivedi, Aged About -52 Years, S/o Late Shri K.P. Dwivedi, R/o E-398, Http Colony, Darri, Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh. 2 4 - Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Sports, New Delhi, India. ... Respondent(s) ( Cause title taken from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat on behalf of Mr. Bhupendra Shrivas, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. T.S. Sahu, CGC on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/07/2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance raised in the present petition has been redressed and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. However, he prays for liberty to file a fresh petition, if the occasion so arises. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to the said prayer. 4. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, and there being no objection from the respondents, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3 5. Although there is no binding precedent requiring this Court to grant liberty to file a fresh writ petition, considering the repeated prayer made on behalf of the petitioner, it is observed that dismissal of the present petition as infructuous shall not preclude the petitioner from availing such remedy as may be available in law, if the occasion so arises. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ruchi RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV